Resting metabolic rate, fat-free mass and catecholamine excretion during weight loss in female obese patients

Citation
R. Menozzi et al., Resting metabolic rate, fat-free mass and catecholamine excretion during weight loss in female obese patients, BR J NUTR, 84(4), 2000, pp. 515-520
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science/Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
ISSN journal
00071145 → ACNP
Volume
84
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
515 - 520
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1145(200010)84:4<515:RMRFMA>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
The reduction in resting metabolic rate (RMR) during weight loss exceeds th at accounted for by changes in body composition by 15 %, suggesting that fa ctors other than fat-free mass (FFM) explain the metabolic adaptation durin g food restriction in obesity. Our study aimed to establish if changes in t he sympathoadrenal system activity, as inferred from an integrated measure such as 24 h urinary excretion of catecholamines, may play a role in the RM R adaptation observed during dietary restriction in obese patients. Ninety- three obese female subjects consumed a low-energy diet (LED) (2930 kJ/d (70 0 kcal/d)) for a 3-week period. At the beginning and at the end of the stud y, 24 h urinary excretion of catecholamines, FFM and RMR were measured. The LED induced a significant reduction in body weight (-3.3 (sem 0.4) kg; P < 0.01), FFM (-1.9 (sem 0.7) kg; P < 0.01) and in the fat mass (-1.2 (sem 0. 5) kg; P < 0.01). Noradrenalin excretion (24 h) decreased during the LED fr om 264 (sem 26) during a weight-maintenance period to 171 (sem 19) nmol/24 h after consumption of the LED for 3 weeks (P < 0.001); mean 24 h adrenalin excretion did not change during the LED (22 (sem 3) during the weight-main tenance period v. 21 (sem 3) nmol/24 h after consumption of the LED for 3 w eeks; NS). The LED induced a significant decrease in RMR (7300 (sem 218) v. 6831 (sem 138) kJ/24 h; P < 0.001). The only independent variable that sig nificantly explained variations in RMR both before and after consumption of the LED for 3 weeks, was FFM (r(2) 0.79 and r(2) 0.80 respectively). Urina ry noradrenalin excretion explained a further 4 % of the variability in RMR , but only before the diet, so that a role of sympathoadrenal system on RMR seems to be present in obese patients in basal conditions but not at the e nd of the LED.