Components and variations in daily energy expenditure of athletic and non-athletic adolescents in free-living conditions

Citation
J. Ribeyre et al., Components and variations in daily energy expenditure of athletic and non-athletic adolescents in free-living conditions, BR J NUTR, 84(4), 2000, pp. 531-539
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science/Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
ISSN journal
00071145 → ACNP
Volume
84
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
531 - 539
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1145(200010)84:4<531:CAVIDE>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
The objectives of the study were to determine: (1) daily energy expenditure (EE) of athletic and non-athletic adolescents of both sexes in free-living conditions; (2) day-to-day variations in daily EE during 1 week; (3) energ y costs of the main activities; and (4) the effect of usual activity on EE during sleep, seated and miscellaneous activities. Fifty adolescents (four groups of eleven to fifteen boys or girls aged 16-19 years) participated in the study. Body composition was measured by the skinfold-thickness method, and VO2max and external mechanical power (EMP) by a direct method (respira tory gas exchanges) on a cycloergometer. Daily EE and partial EE in free-li ving conditions were computed from heart-rate (HR) recordings during seven consecutive days using individual prediction equations established from the data obtained during a 24 h period spent in whole-body calorimeters with s imilar activities. Fat-free mass (FFM), VO2max, EMP, daily EE and EE during sleep were significantly higher in athletic than in non-athletic subjects. After adjustment for FFM, VO2max, EMP, daily EE and EE during exercise wer e still higher in athletic than in non-athletic adolescents (P<0.001). Howe ver, adjusted sleeping EE was not significantly different between athletic and non-athletic adolescents. Increases in exercise EE were partly compensa ted for by significant reductions in EE during schoolwork and miscellaneous activities. Thus, the differences in daily EE between athletic and non-ath letic subjects resulted mainly from increases in FFM and EE during exercise (duration and energy cost).