Extensive contribution of the multidrug transporters P-glycoprotein and Mrp1 to basal drug resistance

Citation
Jd. Allen et al., Extensive contribution of the multidrug transporters P-glycoprotein and Mrp1 to basal drug resistance, CANCER RES, 60(20), 2000, pp. 5761-5766
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
CANCER RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00085472 → ACNP
Volume
60
Issue
20
Year of publication
2000
Pages
5761 - 5766
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-5472(20001015)60:20<5761:ECOTMT>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
Despite accumulating evidence that multidrug resistance transporter protein s play a part in drug resistance in some clinical cancers, it remains uncle ar whether the relatively low levels of multidrug resistance transporter ex pression found in most untreated tumors could substantially affect their ba sal sensitivity to antineoplastic drugs. To shed light on this problem, the drug sensitivities of wild-type mouse cell lines were compared with those of lines in which the A Mdr1a and Mdr1b genes encoding P-glycoprotein (P-gp ) were inactivated and lines in which the Mrp1 gene was inactivated in addi tion to Mdr1a and Mdr1b. These models permit a clean dissection of the cont ribution of each transporter to drug resistance at expression levels simila r to those in normal tissues and avoid complications that might arise from previous exposure of cell lines to drug selection. For substrate drugs, we found that these contributions can indeed be very substantial, Lines lackin g functional P-gp were, on average, markedly more sensitive to paclitaxel ( 16-fold), anthracyclines (4-fold) and Vinca alkaloids (3-fold). Lines lacki ng both P-gp and Mrp1 were (compared with wild-type lines) hypersensitive t o an even broader array of drugs, including epipodophyllotoxins ( 4-7-fold) , anthracyclines (6-7-fold), camptothecins (3-fold), arsenite (il-fold) and Vinca alkaloids, especially vincristine (28-fold), Thus, even very low lev els of P-gp and Mrp1 expression that may be difficult to detect in tumors c ould significantly affect their innate sensitivity to a wide range of clini cally important substrate drugs. An implication is that the use of resistan ce reversal agents to sensitize drug-naive tumors may be appropriate in mor e cases than is presently appreciated.