Abbreviated method for assessing upper airway function in obstructive sleep apnea

Citation
A. Boudewyns et al., Abbreviated method for assessing upper airway function in obstructive sleep apnea, CHEST, 118(4), 2000, pp. 1031-1041
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
CHEST
ISSN journal
00123692 → ACNP
Volume
118
Issue
4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1031 - 1041
Database
ISI
SICI code
0012-3692(200010)118:4<1031:AMFAUA>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Objectives: Previous studies have shown that the level of flow through the upper airway in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is determined b y the critical closing pressure (Pcrit) and the upstream resistance (RN). W e developed a standardized protocol for delineating quasisteady-state press ure-flow relationships for the upper airway from which these variables coul d be derived. In addition, we investigated the effect of body position and sleep stage on these variables by determining Pcrit and RN, and their confi dence intervals (CIs), for each condition. Design: Pressure-flow relationships were constructed in the supine and late ral recumbent positions (nonrapid eye movement [NREM] sleep, n = 10) and in the supine position (rapid eye movement [REM] sleep, n = 5). Setting: University Hospital Antwerp, Belgium. Patients: Ten obese patients (body mass index, 32.0 +/- 5.6 kg/m(2)) with s evere OSA (respiratory disturbance index, 63.0 +/- 14.6 events/h) were stud ied. Interventions: Pressure-flow relationships were constructed from breaths ob tained during a series of step decreases in nasal pressure (34.1 +/- 6.5 ru ns over 3.6 +/- 1.2 h) in NREM sleep and during 7.8 +/- 2.2 runs over 0.8 /- 0.6 h in REM sleep. Results: Maximal inspiratory airflow reached a steady state in the third th rough fifth breaths following a decrease in nasal pressure. Analysis of pre ssure-flow relationships derived from these breaths showed that Pcrit fell from 1.8 (95% CI, -0.1 to 2.7) cm H2O in the supine position to -1.1 cm H2O (95% CI, -1.8 to 0.4 cm H2O; p = 0.009) in the lateral recumbent position, whereas RN did not change significantly. In contrast, no significant effec t of sleep stage was found on either Pcrit or RN. Conclusions: Our methods for delineating upper airway pressure-flow relatio nships during sleep allow for multiple determinations of Pcrit within a sin gle night from which small yet significant differences can be discerned bet ween study conditions.