Cm. Hunter et al., Parameter uncertainty and elasticity analyses of a population model: setting research priorities for shearwaters, ECOL MODEL, 134(2-3), 2000, pp. 299-323
The difference between parameter uncertainty and elasticity analyses of a d
eterministic matrix model was evaluated using the Short-tailed Shearwater (
Puffinus tenuirostris) as a case study. A total of 5000 simulations of the
model were run with input parameters randomly selected from uniform distrib
utions between the upper and lower 95% confidence limits for each parameter
. A multiple regression equation was used to relate population growth to al
l input parameters, two-way interactions and quadratics. Elasticity and par
ameter uncertainty coefficients were estimated as the percent change in pop
ulation growth rate when the minimum and maximum value of each parameter we
re substituted into the regression equation, with all other parameters set
at their mean values. Minimum and maximum values were set at the 95% confid
ence limits for the parameter uncertainty analysis, and at +/- 5% of both m
ean survival and mean mortality estimates for the elasticity analyses. Para
meter rankings differed among the uncertainty and two elasticity analyses.
Probability of pre-breeders staying in the colony and probability of first
breeding ranked highly in the parameter uncertainty analysis. Survival rate
s had higher elasticity coefficient rankings when +/- 5% of mean survival w
as used because altering proportions close to one results in a wider parame
ter range. The importance of interactions was explored but their importance
in this example was found to be low. Incorporating breeding age specific d
ata more closely approximated observed population demographic structure but
had little effect on the magnitude or rankings of the elasticity or parame
ter uncertainty coefficients. The utility of parameter uncertainty and elas
ticity analyses differ. The former determines how uncertainty in parameter
estimation influences model outcomes and is therefore valuable for setting
research priorities. The latter determines the effect on model outcomes of
altering parameter input levels, so is more valuable for ranking the potent
ial effectiveness of alternative management strategies. (C) 2000 Elsevier S
cience B.V. All rights reserved.