Parameter uncertainty and elasticity analyses of a population model: setting research priorities for shearwaters

Citation
Cm. Hunter et al., Parameter uncertainty and elasticity analyses of a population model: setting research priorities for shearwaters, ECOL MODEL, 134(2-3), 2000, pp. 299-323
Citations number
53
Categorie Soggetti
Environment/Ecology
Journal title
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
ISSN journal
03043800 → ACNP
Volume
134
Issue
2-3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
299 - 323
Database
ISI
SICI code
0304-3800(20001030)134:2-3<299:PUAEAO>2.0.ZU;2-8
Abstract
The difference between parameter uncertainty and elasticity analyses of a d eterministic matrix model was evaluated using the Short-tailed Shearwater ( Puffinus tenuirostris) as a case study. A total of 5000 simulations of the model were run with input parameters randomly selected from uniform distrib utions between the upper and lower 95% confidence limits for each parameter . A multiple regression equation was used to relate population growth to al l input parameters, two-way interactions and quadratics. Elasticity and par ameter uncertainty coefficients were estimated as the percent change in pop ulation growth rate when the minimum and maximum value of each parameter we re substituted into the regression equation, with all other parameters set at their mean values. Minimum and maximum values were set at the 95% confid ence limits for the parameter uncertainty analysis, and at +/- 5% of both m ean survival and mean mortality estimates for the elasticity analyses. Para meter rankings differed among the uncertainty and two elasticity analyses. Probability of pre-breeders staying in the colony and probability of first breeding ranked highly in the parameter uncertainty analysis. Survival rate s had higher elasticity coefficient rankings when +/- 5% of mean survival w as used because altering proportions close to one results in a wider parame ter range. The importance of interactions was explored but their importance in this example was found to be low. Incorporating breeding age specific d ata more closely approximated observed population demographic structure but had little effect on the magnitude or rankings of the elasticity or parame ter uncertainty coefficients. The utility of parameter uncertainty and elas ticity analyses differ. The former determines how uncertainty in parameter estimation influences model outcomes and is therefore valuable for setting research priorities. The latter determines the effect on model outcomes of altering parameter input levels, so is more valuable for ranking the potent ial effectiveness of alternative management strategies. (C) 2000 Elsevier S cience B.V. All rights reserved.