Why the brain is probably not a quantum computer

Authors
Citation
M. Tegmark, Why the brain is probably not a quantum computer, INF SCI, 128(3-4), 2000, pp. 155-179
Citations number
80
Categorie Soggetti
Information Tecnology & Communication Systems
Journal title
INFORMATION SCIENCES
ISSN journal
00200255 → ACNP
Volume
128
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
2000
Pages
155 - 179
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-0255(200010)128:3-4<155:WTBIPN>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Based on a calculation of neural decoherence rates, we argue that that the degrees of freedom of the human brain that relate to cognitive processes sh ould be thought of as a classical rather than quantum system, i.e., that th ere is nothing fundamentally wrong with the current classical approach to n eural network simulations. We find that the decoherence timescales (similar to 10(-13)-10(-20) s) are typically much shorter than the relevant dynamic al timescales (similar to 10(-3)-10(-1) s), both for regular neuron firing and for kink-like polarization excitations in microtubules. This conclusion disagrees with suggestions by Penrose and others that the brain acts as a quantum computer, and that quantum coherence is related to consciousness in a fundamental way. (C) 2000 Published by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.