Transurethral microwave thermotherapy v transurethral resection of prostate

Authors
Citation
V. Ravery, Transurethral microwave thermotherapy v transurethral resection of prostate, J ENDOUROL, 14(8), 2000, pp. 693-696
Citations number
14
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY
ISSN journal
08927790 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
8
Year of publication
2000
Pages
693 - 696
Database
ISI
SICI code
0892-7790(200010)14:8<693:TMTVTR>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the gold standard f or the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia for three deca des but is now being challenged by other approaches such as transurethral m icrowave thermotherapy (TUMT), Comparison of these techniques must consider the functional, financial, and social aspects of each procedure. Because o f differences in equipment, it is difficult to draw valid conclusions from the comparisons of the functional results of TURF nu TUMT, but the two appe ar equivalent in relieving symptoms, although TUMT appears slightly less ef fective in improving flow. Preliminary data suggest that TUMT is less expen sive than TURF, but more data are needed. Although high-energy TUMT is not yet on a par with TURF, it is a valid alternative for many patients.