Quantifying the breeding assemblage of reedbed passerines with mist-net and point-count surveys

Citation
B. Poulin et al., Quantifying the breeding assemblage of reedbed passerines with mist-net and point-count surveys, J FIELD ORN, 71(3), 2000, pp. 443-454
Citations number
19
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF FIELD ORNITHOLOGY
ISSN journal
02738570 → ACNP
Volume
71
Issue
3
Year of publication
2000
Pages
443 - 454
Database
ISI
SICI code
0273-8570(200022)71:3<443:QTBAOR>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Data collected in a 40-ha reedbed of southers France were used to compare t he efficiency and limitation of mist-net and point-count techniques in esti mating the composition and structure of a bird assemblage dominated by the Bearded Tit (Panurus biarmicus), the Moustached Warbler (Acrocephalus melan opogon), and the Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus scirpaceus). Null model analyse s were used to determine the effect of spatial variability on estimates of species richness and relative abundance with the two sampling techniques. A 50-m net line operated during 5 h or two 50-m radius point counts of 10 mi n conducted 6 wk apart provided a similar estimation of species composition and relative abundance. While a sampling effort of 10 net lines or 13 poin t counts would permit the detection of a 25% difference in the relative abu ndance of most species (whether over time or among sites), the analyses on community structure suggest that 26 net lines or 13 point counts are necess ary to sample adequately the structure of the bird assemblage (proportion o f individuals from each species) in the 40-ha reedbed. This minimum samplin g effort, however, is strongly influenced by the variance in number of indi viduals sampled, which differed among bird species. For instance, removal o f highly mobile species such as the Bearded Tit, reduced by half the minimu m sampling effort. To provide a reliable estimate of species richness and r elative abundance, point counts must be based on both visual and auditory c ues (30% of the birds sampled were silent), and be carried out at different periods to cover the early breeding season of any abundant species. While point counts are less demanding in the field, manipulation of netted birds permits the documentation of various aspects of their biology, which compen sated for the increased time and effort needed.