This paper begins from the assumption that the meanings of a photograph are
established through its uses. This point has been well made by a number of
historical geographers in recent arguments for the importance of photograp
hy as a record of historically-specific ways of seeing the world. This pape
r, however, extends that argument, and focuses on the relationships between
the photograph and the historical geographer. Drawing on my own experience
s of working in the Print Room of the Victoria and Albert Museum looking at
photographs taken by Lady Hawarden in the mid-nineteenth century, I discus
s the effects of that archive both on them and on myself as a researcher. I
argue that that archive is a powerful space which to a certain degree alli
es the visual and spatial resources of the photographs and the research pra
ctice of the historical geographer to its own discipline; but I also argue
that its discipline can be disrupted by its own contradictory discourses an
d by other relationships between researcher and the photographs. In conclus
ion, I ask for more consideration to be given to contemporary research prac
tice in relation to historical photographs. Historical geographers cannot t
hemselves claim to be merely the descriptive recorders of history and geogr
aphy if they wish to deny this status to photographs. (C) 2000 Academic Pre
ss.