Polymerization, three-dimensional structure and mechanical properties of Dictyostelium versus rabbit muscle actin filaments

Citation
Mo. Steinmetz et al., Polymerization, three-dimensional structure and mechanical properties of Dictyostelium versus rabbit muscle actin filaments, J MOL BIOL, 303(2), 2000, pp. 171-184
Citations number
60
Categorie Soggetti
Molecular Biology & Genetics
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
00222836 → ACNP
Volume
303
Issue
2
Year of publication
2000
Pages
171 - 184
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-2836(20001020)303:2<171:PTSAMP>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
To assess more systematically functional differences among non-muscle and m uscle actins and the effect of specific mutations on their function, we com pared actin from Dictyostelium discoideum (D-actin) with actin from rabbit skeletal muscle (R-actin) with respect to the formation of filaments, their three-dimensional structure and mechanical properties. With Mg2+ occupying the single high-affinity divalent cation-binding site, the course of polym erization is very similar for the two types of actin. In contrast, when Ca2 + is bound, D-actin exhibits a significantly longer lag phase at the onset of polymerization than R-actin. Crossover spacing and helical screw angle of negatively stained filaments a re similar for D and R-F-actin filaments, irrespective of the tightly bound divalent cation. However, three-dimensional helical reconstructions reveal that the intersubunit contacts along the two long-pitch helical strands of D-(Ca)F-actin filaments are more tenuous compared to those in R-(Ca)F-acti n filaments. D-(Mg)F-actin filaments on the other hand exhibit more massive contacts between the two long-pitch helical strands than R-(Mg)F-actin fil aments. Moreover, in contrast to the structure of R-F-actin filaments which is not significantly modulated by the divalent cation, the intersubunit co ntacts both along and between the two long-pitch helical strands are weaker in D-(Ca)F-actin compared to D-(Mg)F-actin filaments. Consistent with thes e structural differences, D-(Ca)F-actin filaments were significantly more f lexible than D-(Mg)F-actin. Taken together, this work documents that despite being highly conserved, mu scle and non-muscle actins exhibit subtle differences in terms of their pol ymerization behavior, and the three-dimensional structure and mechanical pr operties of their F-actin filaments which, in turn, may account for their f unctional diversity. (C) 2000 Academic Press.