E. Vallejo et al., Assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction with quantitative gated SPECT: Accuracy and correlation with first-pass radionuclide angiography, J NUCL CARD, 7(5), 2000, pp. 461-470
Background. Quantitative gated single photon emission computed tomography (
SPECT [QGS]) software is widely used for the assessment of left ventricular
ejection fraction (LVEF). Potentially confounding variables that may affec
t the accuracy of quantitative analysis of LVEF remain undefined. This stud
y evaluated the accuracy of QGS as a means of determining LVEF in a wide ra
nge of LVEF values; evaluated the effect of extracardiac activity, count st
atistics, heart size, and perfusion defects on the accuracy of QGS LVEF; an
d compared QGS LVEF obtained at rest with that obtained after stress.
Methods and Results. QGS-derived LVEF was compared with rest first-pass rad
ionuclide angiography (FPRNA) LVEF in 400 electrocardiographic-gated SPECT
studies. The overall correlation between QGS and FPRNA LVEF was only fair (
r = 0.66, SEE = 11.85%). In 35 of the patient studies (9%) with high extrac
ardiac activity, the automated software failed, and no correlation was obta
ined. In the remaining 365 patient studies (91%), left ventricular contours
were successfully identified. In these studies, correlation was better (r
= 0.74, SEE = 9.77%). Agreement was better for images with high counts (r =
0.81, SEE = 8.66%) than for images with low counts (r = 0.61, SEE = 11.17%
). Patient studies with abnormal LVEF had better correlation (r = 0.77, SEE
= 6.4%) than studies with normal LVEF (r = 0.46, SEE = 10.2%). Agreement b
etween QGS LVEF and FPRNA LVEF was better in hearts with large end diastoli
c volumes (> 104 mL) than in hearts with small volumes. Overall, mean QGS L
VEF was lower than mean FPRNA LVEF (54% +/- 14% vs 58% +/- 14%, P < .0001).
There was no difference between mean rest and stress QGS LVEF in the same
patients, even in patients with stress-induced ischemia.
Conclusions. QGS is a valuable method for assessing resting LVEF. However,
QGS LVEF is often lower than FPRNA LVEF. Accuracy is affected by high extra
cardiac activity, low count density, and small size of the left ventricle.