In the last few decades economists have devoted significant professional at
tention to developing and applying methods to place monetary values on envi
ronmental services. This paper summarizes the criticisms from within the ec
onomics profession of the environmental valuation research program. General
ly, the critics question whether meaningful benefit estimates can be made f
or environmental services and, if made, whether the estimates are acceptabl
e guides to making environmental policy. We conclude by noting that the deb
ate over the "value of valuation" in water resources will not subside, beca
use this debate is part of a wider intellectual dialogue regarding the role
of analysts and quantification in the making of public policy.