The purpose of this study was to investigate people's expectation of o
thers' ingroup favoritism, and the effect of expecting others to take
part in reward allocation decision on ingroup favoritism in reward all
ocation. Subjects were randomly assigned to two groups, and were asked
to rate attractiveness of ingroup members, and to allocate reward to
ingroup and outgroup under two conditions. In the unilateral condition
, the subject alone was to make the decision, and in the multilateral
condition, every subject was to. The results indicated that equally in
all conditions, subjects rated ingroup members more attractive, and e
xpected others to allocate more reward to own groups. Reward allocatio
n that favored ingroup occurred only under the multilateral condition,
where everyone participated in reward allocation, regardless of wheth
er the subject's own reward was dependent on others' decisions or was
a fixed amount. The findings suggest that ingroup favoritism was not a
result of quasi-strategy of self-interest in an attempt to maximize o
wn gains, but of psychological group formation.