M. Lenoir et al., Are better eye movements an advantage in ball games? A study of prosaccadic and antisaccadic eye movements, PERC MOT SK, 91(2), 2000, pp. 546-552
The aim of this study was to compare prosaccadic and antisaccadic eye movem
ents of experts in ball sports and controls. In the prosaccadic and antisac
cadic task, subjects made saccades respectively towards and away from a sud
denly appearing stimulus. By means of infrared-oculography,hy, we compared
horizontal eye movements of experts (n=18) and controls (n=20). Experts had
shorter overall saccadic latencies, but significantly shorter latencies oc
curred only on the antisaccade task, not on the prosaccade task. Our findin
gs seem to support the concept that prosaccades and antisaccades have diffe
rent underlying mechanisms and that expertise in ball games mainly improves
antisaccadic performance in terms of latency and variability.