Three fecal enrichment techniques and three commercial ELISA tests for cryp
tosporidia, giardia and echinococci are compared by examining 200 fecal sam
ples of dogs and cats in order to determine the practicability and the diag
nostical accuracy under conditions of daily practice. The fecal flotation t
echnique with sodium nitrate (Fecalyzer(R)) is shown to be both effective a
nd low in cost for detecting coccidia and nematodes. For diagnosis of cesto
des the combined sedimentation-flotation technique with zinc sulfate is mor
e sensitive. Although it can be used as a screening method for detection of
nematodes the expense of time and labor is higher than with the sodium nit
rate technique. For the experienced examiner the MIFC sedimentation method
is efficient in detecting protozoa by microscopical analysis. Ova of helmin
ths can also be found with this more expensive method. The ELISA tests for
cryptosporidia and giardia take time but their simple handling makes them s
uitable for use in the veterinary practice. In contrast the ELISA test for
echinococci can only be performed by specialized laboratories due to its ph
otometrical evaluation.