Deflection of the hair bundle atop a sensory hair cell modulates the open p
robability of mechanosensitive ion channels. In response to sustained defle
ctions, hair cells adapt. Two fundamentally distinct models have been propo
sed to explain transducer adaptation. Both models support the notion that c
hannel open probability is modulated by calcium that enters via the transdu
ction channels, Both also suggest that the primary effect of adaptation is
to shift the deflection-response [I(X)] relationship in the direction of th
e applied stimulus, thus maintaining hair bundle sensitivity. The models di
ffer in several respects. They operate on different time scales: the faster
on the order of a few milliseconds or less and the slower on the order of
10 ms or more. The model proposed to explain fast adaptation suggests that
calcium enters and binds at or near the transduction channels to stabilize
a closed conformation. The:model proposed to explain the slower adaptation
suggests that adaptation is mediated by an active, force-generating process
that regulates the effective stimulus applied to the transduction channels
, Here we discuss the evidence in support of each model and consider the po
ssibility that both may function to varying degrees in hair cells of differ
ent species and sensory organs.