Objective: standardized symptom scores have been developed to evaluate void
ing disorders. The most widely used in France are the IPSS and Madsen-Ivers
en. These self-assessment questionnaires are by definition subjective. The
objective of this Study was lo compare the capacities of the IPSS and Madse
n-Iversen score ro describe thp patient's voiding status and to define the
patient's level of understanding of these questionnaires.
Patients and Methods: One hundred male patients were included in this prosp
ective study. All completed an IPSS and Madsen-Iversen questionnaire. Physi
cal examination, uroflowmetry and post-voiding bladder ultrasonography were
also performed
Results: The description of the voiding status was considered to be satisfa
ctory or fairly satisfactory, with a total of 85% for IPSS and 87% for Mads
en-Iversen. Understanding of the questionnaire was high with a value of 84%
for IPSS and 83% for Madsen-Iversen. Neither the order of completion of th
e IPSS or Madsen-Iversen questionnaires nor the patient's age influenced th
ese results.
Conclusions: No difference was demonstrated between the IPSS score and the
MADSEN-IVERSEN questionnaire in terms of description and comprehension. How
ever; one out of five patients experienced difficulties completing these qu
estionnaires.