Over the past few years a variety of equivalent dose (DE) determination tec
hniques for quartz, which are truly single aliquot-based, have been propose
d. Such methods avoid the need for inter-aliquot normalisation, and provide
considerable improvements in the precision of equivalent dose (DE) estimat
es. Much of the research leading to these developments have been based on d
etailed investigations of a few samples, primarily from Australia. All 'pro
tocols' developed have performed impressively. It is necessary, however, to
verify the consistency of the single aliquot DE determination methods on a
wide range of samples before they can be considered as prescribed or stand
ard. We have analysed approximately 100 samples from a range of sedimentary
environments and geological provinces in an attempt to confirm the robustn
ess of the single aliquot techniques. Up to 65% of samples measured in our
laboratory were not suited to analysis via application of single aliquot ad
ditive dose (SAAD) procedures. This relates to a range of factors, includin
g lack of sample sensitivity and dose dependent sensitivity changes. Furthe
rmore, we have observed some problems in dating young sediments using singl
e aliquot regeneration (SAR) methods. Critically, we observe that sample to
sample variability on quartz luminescence (thermally- and optically-stimul
ated) behaviour is considerable, and many samples are found to exhibit beha
viour which contrasts greatly from that described in recent phenomenologica
l studies. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.