Under the auspices of the international Rhinologic Society (IRS) there is a
n 'International Committee on Objective Assessment of the Nasal Airways: In
1984 Rhinology published the Committee's recommendations regarding rhinoma
nometry (Clement, 1984). During the last Congresses of the European Rhinolo
gic Society (ERS) a subcommittee within that committee has discussed nasal
provocations and the value of measuring nasal patency, airflow and airflow
resistance to evaluate such provocations. The following is an effort to a c
onsensus of indications and techniques for nasal provocation and to a criti
cal analysis of methods 20 measure the effects. Only the most known methods
will be discussed, ie. acoustic rhinometry, rhinostereometry, nasal peak a
irflow and rhinomanometry with its different techniques. For graded respons
es after provocations the use of such methods is of clinical value only in
combination with scores from symptoms such as sneezes and secretion, as all
ergic rhinitis symptoms consist of obstruction, sneezing, itching and conco
mitant symptoms of the neighbouring organs. For research all methods can be
recommended to be used and their respective value is depending on the spec
ific scientific purposes.