A. Gauthier et al., Relative efficacy of sildenafil compared to other treatment options for erectile dysfunction, SOUTH MED J, 93(10), 2000, pp. 962-965
Objective, We examined and compared the efficacy of sildenafil in patients
previously using other agents or devices for erectile dysfunction (ED) trea
tment.
Methods. We identified 47 patients with organic ED who had tried other ther
apies (intracavernosal injection therapy [ICIT], intraurethral prostaglandi
n suppositories [IPS], vacuum erection devices [VEDs], or yohimbine) before
using sildenafil. Comparisons of the efficacy of sildenafil to the previou
sly used agent or device were assessed by telephone questionnaire. Response
s were compared using nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum and analysis of varia
nce testing.
Results. Sildenafil therapy was no more effective than ICIT or VEDs but was
more effective than TPS. No significant difference occurred in response to
sildenafil with age. Of 22 patients achieving erections adequate for inter
course with their previous therapy, 14 (63%) achieved equal or improved ere
ctions with sildenafil. Of the remaining 18 patients who had erections inad
equate for intercourse with previous therapy, 5 (27%) bad adequate erection
s with sildenafil.
Conclusions. Oral sildenafil therapy provides results comparable to those o
f other available ED treatment modalities. A trial of this drug in this pat
ient population is warranted.