Background. Studies suggest that the selective use of anaerobic blood cultu
res may represent a more cost-effective laboratory approach when anaerobic
bacterial infection is suspected.
Methods. A 5-year retrospective study was done at a Veterans' Affairs hospi
tal to determine the utility of routinely including anaerobic blood culture
when sampling for bacteremia.
Results. A total of 22,075 anaerobic blood cultures were collected from our
adult population. Significant anaerobic pathogens were isolated from only
0.14% of these blood cultures. An anaerobic infection could have been suspe
cted in 92% of our patients.
Conclusions. Significant anaerobic bloodstream infections occurred in only
0.14% of blood cultures. In addition, the majority of the patients identifi
ed with anaerobic bacteremia had clinical conditions that would have sugges
ted a high likelihood of anaerobic bacteremia. These observations suggest t
hat selective rather than routine use of anaerobic blood cultures may be ap
propriate in a veteran population.