A prospective study of psychological predictors of lumbar surgery outcome

Study Design. Prospective design in which 102 patients were evaluated with a battery of psychological assessment tests 1-2 weeks before surgery and ou tcome was assessed 6 months and 1 year after surgery. Objectives. The study examined whether three aspects of psychological distr ess (depression, anxiety, and hostility) predict Several Surgical outcomes (employment status, subjective pain change ratings, and changes in function al abilities). Summary of Background Data. Surgery for back pain has been shown to yield p oor results in 15-45% Of patients. Tools are needed to identify those "at r isk" for poor outcome. Aspects of emotional distress, including anxiety, de pression, and hostility, have been found-to-be relevant to various illness outcomes (e.g,, cancer, heart disease), but their influence has not been pr ospectively evaluated for back pain surgical outcome. Methods. Study patients completed measures of distress before surgery, incl uding the Spielberger Trait Anxiety Inventory, Zung Depression Scale, Modif ied Somatic Perception Questionnaire, and Cook-Medley Hostility Scale. At 1 -year follow-up, patients completed pain change ratings, functional abiliti es measure (Dallas Pain Questionnaire), and questions about employment stat us. Results. Multivariate regression analyses, controlling for significant demo graphic variables, found that failure to return to work was predicted by pr esurgical anxiety (P < 0.001) and depression [P < 0.01); allure to report i mprovement in pain was predicted by presurgical somatic anxiety (P < 0.01) and depression (P < 0.058); and failure to report improved functional abili ties was predicted by presurgical somatic anxiety (P < 0.01) and depression (P < 0.05). Hostility did not predict any outcome. Regression analyses fou nd a strong predictor to be a combination of the Zung: Depression Scale and Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire, known as the Distress and Risk Assessment Method (DRAM). Conclusions. These results indicate that screening for presurgical distress is likely to identify those patients at risk for poor outcome. Studies to evaluate whether presurgical psychological treatment improves outcome are w arranted.