In recent years, numerous studies have observed that many hard combinatoria
l decision problems exhibit behaviour described as a 'phase-transition'. Th
is is the phenomenon whereby typical instances of a problem display a drama
tic shift in certain characteristics as some parameter of the instances is
varied. Such characteristics include the likelihood of an instance having a
solution and the time taken by a search algorithm. The apparent pervasiven
ess of phase-transitions in hard combinatorial search problems has led to c
ontrasting claims being advanced concerning to what extent all NP-complete
problems exhibit phase-transitions. The established importance of exploitin
g phase-transition effects in the design of search heuristics provides a st
rong motivation for assessing how valid such claims may be. In this paper w
e argue that questions concerning the generality of phase-transition phenom
ena are, at present, ill-defined. In order to address this difficulty, we p
ropose and examine rigorous complexity-theoretic models of the statement 't
he decision problem D has a phase-transition'. Within these models it is pr
oved that for certain 'natural' definitions contrasting results about phase
-transition behaviour can be proved. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rig
hts reserved.