Estimates of cancer risk from short-term exposure to carcinogens generally
rely on cancer potency values derived from chronic, lifetime-exposure studi
es and assume that exposures of limited duration are associated with a prop
ortional reduction in cancer risk. The validity of this approach was tested
empirically using data from both chronic lifetime and stop-exposure studie
s of carcinogens conducted by the National Toxicology Program. Eleven compo
unds were identified as having data sufficient for comparison of relative c
ancer potencies from short-term versus lifetime exposure, The data were mod
eled using the chronic data alone, and also using the chronic and the stop-
exposure data combined, where stop-exposure doses were adjusted to average
lifetime exposure. Maximum likelihood estimates of the dose corresponding t
o a 1% added cancer risk (ED01) were calculated along with their associated
95% upper and lower confidence bounds. Statistical methods were used to ev
aluate the degree to which adjusted stop-exposures produced risks equal to
those estimated from the chronic exposures. For most chemical/cancer endpoi
nt combinations, inclusion of stop-exposure data reduced the ED,,, indicati
ng that the chemical had greater apparent potency under stop-exposure condi
tions, For most chemicals and endpoints, consistency in potency between con
tinuous and stop-exposure studies was achieved when the stop-exposure doses
were averaged over periods of less than a lifetime-in some cases as short
as the exposure duration itself, While the typical linear adjustments for l
ess-than-lifetime exposure in cancer risk assessment can theoretically resu
lt in under- or overestimation of risks, empirical observations in this ana
lysis suggest that an underestimation of cancer risk from short-term exposu
res is more likely.