Modeling and predicting selected immunological effects of a chemical stressor (3,4-dichloropropionanilide) using the area under the corticosterone concentration versus time curve
Sb. Pruett et al., Modeling and predicting selected immunological effects of a chemical stressor (3,4-dichloropropionanilide) using the area under the corticosterone concentration versus time curve, TOXICOL SCI, 58(1), 2000, pp. 77-87
Many chemicals and drugs can induce a neuroendocrine stress response that c
an be immunosuppressive. Mathematical models have been developed that allow
prediction of the immunological impact of such stress responses in mice on
the basis of exposure to the important stress-related mediator corticoster
one. The area under the corticosterone concentration vs. time curve (AUC) h
as been used as an indicator of cumulative corticosterone exposure in these
modeling studies, In the present study, an immunotoxicant known to induce
a stress response, 3,4-dichloropropionanilide (propanil), was evaluated to
determine if corticosterone AUC values are related to suppression of immuno
logical parameters in mice treated with this chemical. Linear relationships
between corticosterone AUC values and suppression of the following paramet
ers were noted in B6C3F1 female mice: thymus cellularity and thymus subpopu
lation percentages, splenic subpopulation percentages, natural killer cell
activity, MHC class II protein expression, and IgG1 and IgG2a antibody resp
onses to antigen. Linear models derived in previous studies using mice trea
ted with exogenous corticosterone or with restraint stress effectively pred
icted the immunological effects of 3,4-dichloropropionanilide on the basis
of corticosterone AUC values. The models derived using immobilization stres
s were more effective (r(2) for observed vs. predicted = 0.90) than the mod
els derived using mice treated with exogenous corticosterone (r(2) for obse
rved vs, predicted = 0.65). This was expected, because most stressors induc
e a variety of immunomodulatory mediators, not just corticosterone. These f
indings have implications for risk assessment in immunotoxicology.