Is the customary word "data" a good name for archaeological records and fac
ts? "Data" means the things that are "given" brit archaeological observatio
ns and facts are never given at all. Rathe,; they are captured by the resea
rcher; who seeks to grasp from the material record the essentials of some c
omplex and little-known phenomenon, often remote in time and usually ambigu
ous in material expression. We should prefer to use the better word "capta,
" the things that have been captured, and to realize that this word capture
s the essence of what we do.