Office of management and budget racial categories and implications for American Indians and Alaska natives

Citation
L. Burhansstipanov et De. Satter, Office of management and budget racial categories and implications for American Indians and Alaska natives, AM J PUB HE, 90(11), 2000, pp. 1720-1723
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science","Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
ISSN journal
00900036 → ACNP
Volume
90
Issue
11
Year of publication
2000
Pages
1720 - 1723
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-0036(200011)90:11<1720:OOMABR>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
This commentary provides a brief overview of American Indian and Alaskan po pulations in the United Stales and selected data issues. The focus of this commentary is an excerpt of recommendations related to Office of Management and Budget Directive 15 (racial categories) and American Indians and Alask a Natives. Of paramount concern is not only that all federal. state, and local agencie s collect data on American Indians and Alaska Natives, but also that report s, findings, and peer-reviewed publications include data an American Indian s and Alaska Natives. It is of no use to recruit American Indians and Alask a Natives into studies and projects if their race/ethnicity-specific data a re not disseminated. Collapsing racial/ethnic categories, such as Asians, Native Hawaiians and P acific Islanders, and American Indians and Alaska Natives, into a single ra cial category of "other" is of no benefit to public health policymakers, re searchers, and tribal planners. Likewise, tribal affiliation should be coll ected whenever it is feasible to do so. Insufficient inclusion and inaccura te identification of American Indians and Alaska Natives in national survey s has also resulted in a dearth of baseline data in significant reports suc h as Healthy People 2010.