Ventricular arrhythmias with or without programmed electrical stimulation after incremental overdosage with lidocaine, bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine
L. Groban et al., Ventricular arrhythmias with or without programmed electrical stimulation after incremental overdosage with lidocaine, bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine, ANESTH ANAL, 91(5), 2000, pp. 1103-1111
Citations number
36
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
It is unclear whether the mechanism of death from local anesthetic (LA) int
oxication is primarily a consequence of cardiac arrhythmias or myocardial c
ontractile depression, and whether LAs might differ in this susceptibility
to these two mechanisms. By using programmable electrical stimulation (PES)
protocols in anesthetized, ventilated dogs, we compared the arrhythmogenic
potential of bupivacaine (BUP), ropivacaine (ROP), levobupivacaine (LBUP),
and lidocaine (LIDO). Open-chest dogs were randomized to receive escalatin
g incremental infusions of the four local anesthetics until cardiovascular
collapse. We assumed a concentration relationship of 4:1 for LIDO/BUP, LBUP
, and ROP. The effective refractory period did not change significantly unt
il the dose increment corresponding to target concentrations of 8 and 32 mu
g/mL for BUP, LBUP, ROP, and LIDO, respectively. Thirty percent to 50% incr
eases in effective refractory period occurred in surviving dogs at this dos
e. The incidence of spontaneous or PES-induced ventricular tachycardia and
ventricular fibrillation did not differ among groups. Compared with LIDO, t
he incidence of PES-induced extrasystoles was more frequent for BUP- and LB
UP-treated dogs (P < 0.05). ROP-treated dogs did not differ from LIDO-treat
ed dogs with respect to PES-induced extrasystoles. At the dose increment pr
eceding cardiovascular collapse, all LAs produced significant increases in
heart rate and reductions in blood pressure compared with their respective
baseline values. The incidence of programmable electrical stimulation-induc
ed ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation with BUP does not differ from t
he incidence that occurs with the single S(-) enantiomers LBUP and ROP, pro
viding further evidence against stereoselective arrhythmogenesis as a prima
ry component of local anesthetic-induced cardiotoxicity.