Several lines of evidence suggest that the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (N
MDA) and nitric oxide (NO) systems are involved in morphine tolerance. Cycl
ooxygenase (COX) inhibitors may also play a role in morphine tolerance by i
nteracting with both systems. In the present study, we examined the effects
of the COX inhibitors N-(2-cyclohexyloxy-4-nitrophenyl) methanesulphonamid
e (NS-398, selective COX2 inhibitor) and indomethacin (non-selective COX in
hibitor) on the development of antinociceptive tolerance of morphine in a r
at spinal model. The antinociceptive effect was determined by the tail-flic
k test. Tolerance was induced by injection of morphine 50 mug intrathecally
(i.t.) twice daily for 5 days. The effects of NS-398 and indomethacin on m
orphine antinociceptive tolerance were examined after administering these d
rugs i.t. 10 min before each morphine injection. Neither NS-398 nor indomet
hacin alone produced an antinociception effect at doses up to 40 mug. NS-39
8 and indomethacin did not enhance the antinociceptive effect of morphine i
n naive and morphine-tolerant rats. However, they shifted the morphine anti
nociceptive dose-response curve to the left when coadministered with morphi
ne during tolerance induction, and reduced the increase in the ED50 of morp
hine (dose producing 50% of the maximum response) three- to four-fold. Coll
ectively, these findings and previous studies suggest that COX may be invol
ved in the development of morphine tolerance without directly enhancing its
antinociceptive effect.