We report results of an experiment testing for present-value maximizat
ion in intertemporal income choice. Two-thirds of subjects did not max
imize present value. Through a series of experimental manipulations th
at impose costs on non-present value maximizers, we are able to reduce
the level of violations substantially. We find, however, that a sizea
ble proportion of subjects continue to systematically violate present-
value principles. Our interpretation is that these subjects either can
not or choose not to distinguish between income and expenditure in mak
ing their choices. Self-management, bounded rationality, and sequence
preference are suggested as possible explanations for such behavior.