Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser ablation is widely accepted as the most effectiv
e first line surgical treatment of recurrent laryngeal papilloma. However,
vaporization of papilloma with the CO2 laser exposes the patient and staff
to a potentially infective plume. Furthermore, unsuitable pathological tiss
ue specimens and scarring of the surrounding laryngeal architecture are ine
vitable consequences of the thermal energy generated by this instrument. Fo
llowing their innovative use in endonasal surgery, powered laryngeal micror
esecting instruments (Xomed Shavers) have been developed for laryngeal surg
ery. We assessed the value of these new instruments in five patients who ha
d previously undergone laser ablation. All of the patients reported that th
eir postoperative recovery was the 'same as' or 'better than' that followin
g laser surgery. The surgeon reported that though there was more bleeding,
shaver excision of papilloma provided good clearance of disease, easy colle
ction of pathological samples; and a potentially safer and faster alternati
ve to laser excision.