Prospective memory, which involves remembering to perform an action at a fu
ture time, is used frequently in daily life. Few researchers, however, have
studied this type of memory with children. The present study examined and
compared 3- and 5-year-olds' performance on naturalistic and computer-based
prospective memory tasks. The effects of incentive and external cues on me
mory performance were examined along with the relationship between prospect
ive and retrospective memory. The results indicated that 5-year-olds demons
trated greater prospective memory performance than did 3-year-olds and neit
her incentive nor external cues consistently improved performance. Relation
ships between performance on the naturalistic and computer tasks varied wit
h age. In contrast to the adult literature, younger children's prospective
and retrospective memory performances were related. Implications of these f
indings are discussed. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.