Preservation of sight in diabetes: developing a national risk reduction programme

Citation
L. Garvican et al., Preservation of sight in diabetes: developing a national risk reduction programme, DIABET MED, 17(9), 2000, pp. 627-634
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition
Journal title
DIABETIC MEDICINE
ISSN journal
07423071 → ACNP
Volume
17
Issue
9
Year of publication
2000
Pages
627 - 634
Database
ISI
SICI code
0742-3071(200009)17:9<627:POSIDD>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Background Early treatment for diabetic retinopathy is effective at saving sight, but dependent on pre-symptomatic detection. Although 60% of people w ith diabetes have their eyes examined annually, few UK health authorities h ave systematic programmes that meet the British Diabetic Association's stan dards for sensitivity (>80%) and specificity (>95%). Screening is generally performed by general practitioners and optometrists, with some camera-base d schemes, operated by dedicated staff. The National Screening Committee co mmissioned a group to develop a model and cost estimates for a comprehensiv e national risk-reduction programme. Ophthalmoscopy Evidence indicates that direct ophthalmoscopy using a hand-h eld ophthalmoscope does not give adequate specificity and sensitivity, and should be abandoned as a systematic screening technique. Indirect ophthalmo scopy using a slit lamp is sensitive and specific enough to be viable, and widespread availability in high street optometrists is an advantage, but th e method requires considerable skill. Photographic schemes The principal advantage of camera-based screening is t he capturing of an image, for patient education, review of disease progress ion, and quality assurance. Digital cameras are becoming cheaper, and are n ow the preferred option. The image is satisfactory for screening and may be transmitted electronically. With appropriate training and equipment, diffe rent professional groups might participate in programme delivery, based on local decisions. Cost issues Considerable resources are already invested in ad hoc screening , with inevitable high referral rates incurring heavy outpatient costs. Tre atment for advanced disease is expensive, but less likely to be effective. The costs of a new systematic screening and treatment programme appear simi lar to current expenditure, as a result of savings in treatment of late-pre senting advanced retinopathy. Conclusion A systematic national programme based on digital photography is proposed.