Ws. Marras et al., Prospective validation of a low-back disorder risk model and assessment ofergonomic interventions associated with manual materials handling tasks, ERGONOMICS, 43(11), 2000, pp. 1866-1886
The evaluation of low-back disorder risk associated with materials handling
tasks can be performed using a variety of assessment tools. Most of these
tools vary greatly in their underlying logic, yet few have been assessed fo
r their predictive ability. It is important to document how well an assessm
ent tool realistically reflects the job's injury risk, since only valid and
accurate tools can reliably determine whether a given ergonomic interventi
on will result in a future reduction in back injuries. The goal of this stu
dy was to evaluate how well a previously reported low-back disorder (LBD) r
isk assessment model (Marras et al. 1993) could predict changes in LBD inju
ry rates as the physical conditions to which employees are exposed were cha
nged. Thirty-six repetitive materials handling jobs from 16 different compa
nies were included in this prospective cohort study. Of these 36 jobs, 32 u
nderwent an ergonomic intervention during the observation period, and four
jobs in which no intervention occurred served as a comparison group. The tr
unk motions and workplace features of 142 employees performing these jobs w
ere observed both before and after workplace interventions were incorporate
d. In addition, the jobs' LBD rates were documented for these pre- and post
-intervention periods. The results indicated that a statistically significa
nt correlation existed between changes in the jobs' estimated LBD risk valu
es and changes in their actual low-back incidence rates over the observatio
n period. Linear and Poisson regression models also were developed to predi
ct a change in a job's incidence rate and the number of LBD on a job respec
tively, as a function of the job's risk change using this assessment model.
Finally, this prospective study showed which ergonomic interventions consi
stently reduced the jobs' mean low-back incidence rates. These results supp
ort use of the LBD risk model to assess accurately a job's potential to lea
d to low-back injuries among its employees.