K. Fitch et al., European criteria for the appropriateness and necessity of coronary revascularization procedures, EUR J CAR-T, 18(4), 2000, pp. 380-387
Objectives: Large variations in the use of coronary revascularization proce
dures have led many countries to apply the RAND appropriateness method to d
evelop specific criteria describing patients who should be offered these pr
ocedures. The method is based on the work of a multidisciplinary expert pan
el that reviews a synthesis of the scientific evidence and rates the approp
riateness of a comprehensive list of indications for the procedure being st
udied. Previous studies, however, have all involved single-country panels.
We tested the feasibility of carrying out a multinational panel to rate the
appropriateness and necessity of coronary revascularization, thereby produ
cing recommendations for common European criteria. Methods: Using the RAND
methodology, a multispecialty (interventional cardiologists, non-interventi
onal cardiologists and cardiovascular surgeons), multinational (The Netherl
ands, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom) panel rated the ap
propriateness and necessity of indications for percutaneous transluminal co
ronary angioplasty (PTCA) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG).
A synthesis of the evidence and list of indications for PTCA and CABG were
sent to 15 panelists, three from each country, who performed their ratings
in three rounds. Results: For PTCA, 24% of the indications were appropriate
and necessary, 16% were appropriate, 43% were uncertain and 17% were inapp
ropriate. The corresponding values for CABG were 33% appropriate and necess
ary, 7% appropriate, 40% uncertain and 20% inappropriate. The proportion of
indications rated with disagreement was 4% for PTCA and 7% for CABG. Concl
usion: Multinational panels appear to be a feasible method of addressing is
sues concerning the appropriateness and necessity of medical procedures in
western European countries. The criteria produced provide a common tool tha
t can he used to measure the overuse and underuse of medical procedures and
to guide decision-making. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserv
ed.