In addition to food and fibre, agricultural land provides public amenities
in the form of wildlife habitat, protection of natural resources, open spac
es, aesthetic scenery and cultural preservation. Most previous studies have
used contingent valuation methods to measure the value of these services.
We use an alternative procedure, which provides a value of the agricultural
landscape per se, as measured against a specific alternative, and is based
on whether agricultural landscape had an influence on visitation decisions
. Our procedure involves a travel cost model estimated by count-data regres
sion techniques using (truncated) samples of visitors. An application to tw
o regions in Israel reveals a substantial value for agricultural landscape,
as compared with the traditional returns to farming.