Wt. Stott et al., Absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion of intravenously and dermally administered triethanolamine in mice, FOOD CHEM T, 38(11), 2000, pp. 1043-1051
Triethanolamine (TEA) is an amino alcohol having widespread applications in
consumer goods and as an industrial chemical. A number of relatively high-
dose dermal toxicity studies have been conducted in rats and mice reflectin
g the principal route of human exposure to TEA. The absorption, distributio
n, metabolism and excretion (ADME) of C-14-TEA derived radioactivity were d
etermined in male C3H/HeJ mice following dermal application of 2000 mg/kg (
neat) or, to characterize blood kinetics, intravenous (iv) injection of 1 m
g/kg C-14-TEA, Balance and excretion data were also collected in mice utili
zing several dermal dosing scenarios (1000 mg/kg in acetone, 2000 mg/kg nea
t, 2000 mg/kg in water) and, for comparative purposes, in male Fischer 344
rats dosed dermally with 1000 mg/kg neat C-14-TEA. Urine, feces, expired CO
2 (iv) and, where appropriate, blood were collected over a 24- or 48-hour p
eriod post-dosing. The half-life for dermal absorption of radioactivity was
estimated to be 1.3 hours. Intravenously administered radioactivity was el
iminated in a biphasic manner with a prominent initial phase (half-life of
0.3 hr) followed by a slower terminal phase (half-life of 10 hr). Radioacti
vity was excreted primarily via the urine (49-69%) as unmetabolized TEA, re
gardless of dosage, route or vehicle used, Fecal excretion of radioactivity
comprised 16-28% of dose administered, The body burden at sacrifice (sum o
f liver, kidney, carcass and non-application site skin) ranged from 3 to 6%
of the dose. It was concluded that TEA is absorbed extensively following d
ermal application to mice at dosages relevant to toxicity testing and that
acetone or water vehicles do not appear to significantly alter total uptake
. Significantly, the blood kinetics and ADME of TEA in mice and/or rats dif
fers from that of a related chemical, diethanolamine, which appears to be m
ore toxic to rodents than TEA. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights re
served.