Benthic-pelagic coupling: a comparison of the community structure of benthic and planktonic heterotrophic protists in shallow inlets of the southern Baltic
T. Garstecki et al., Benthic-pelagic coupling: a comparison of the community structure of benthic and planktonic heterotrophic protists in shallow inlets of the southern Baltic, FRESHW BIOL, 45(2), 2000, pp. 147-167
1. The taxonomic composition, abundance and biomass of heterotrophic protis
ts (ciliates, heterotrophic flagellates (HF), rhizopods and actinopods) in
the sediment and water column of shallow inlets of the Southern Baltic was
studied under a variety of environmental conditions during 1996-1997. A sha
llow, highly eutrophic station and a deeper, less eutrophic station were co
mpared.
2. Community biomass ranged from 0.12 to 0.34 mug C cm(-3) in the water col
umn and from 1.5 to 105 mug C cm(-3) in the sediment. Heterotrophic protist
s dominated zooplankton biomass at both stations (73% and 84% mean contribu
tion), while they were of minor importance within the zoobenthos. Expressed
per unit area, benthic biomass contributed a significant part (44% and 49%
) to the total heterotrophic protistan community at both stations.
3. Although the methodology for counting ciliates and HF was focussed on a
high taxonomic resolution, the results reveal some general trends in the di
stribution of heterotrophic protists: protozooplankton biomass was dominate
d by flagellates (80% mean biomass contribution) at the shallow station and
by ciliates (73% mean biomass contribution) at the deep station. In the be
nthos at both stations, ciliates were the dominant protozoans, followed by
the hitherto little-studied rhizopods (25% and 35% mean biomass contributio
n) and flagellates.
4. The degree of benthic-pelagic coupling differed between taxonomic groups
. Benthic and pelagic communities of ciliates showed little taxonomic overl
ap. In contrast, many heterotrophic flagellate species were found both in t
he benthos and in the pelagic. These benthic-pelagic species contributed si
gnificantly to the biomass of HF in the water column. The planktonic rhizop
od community consisted of a subset of those species found in the benthos.
5. The abundance of benthic and pelagic protists was positively correlated
at the shallow station, but taxonomic data indicate that the direct exchang
e between benthic and pelagic communities was only partly responsible.