As retailers adopt lean retailing practices, manufacturers are feeling the
pinch. Retailers no longer place large seasonal orders for goods in advance
-instead, they require ongoing replenishment of stock, forcing manufacturer
s to predict demand and then hold substantial inventories indefinitely. Man
ufacturers now carry the cost of inventory risk-the possibility that demand
will dry up and goods will have to be sold below cost. And as product prol
iferation increases, customer demand becomes harder to predict.
Most manufacturers apply one inventory policy for all stock-keeping units i
n a product line. But the inventory demand for SKUs within the same product
line can vary significantly. SKUs with high volume typically have little v
ariation in weekly sales, while slow-selling SKUs can vary enormously in we
ekly sales. The greater the variation,the larger the inventory the manufact
urer must hold relative to an SKU's expected weekly sales. By differentiati
ng inventory policies at the SKU level, manufacturers can reduce inventorie
s for the high-volume SKUs and increase them for the low-volume ones-and th
ereby improve the profitability of the entire line.
SKU-level differentiation can also be applied to sourcing strategies. Inste
ad of producing all the SKUs for a product line at a single location, eithe
r offshore at low cost or close to market at higher cost, manufacturers can
typically do better by going for a mixed allocation. Low-variation goods s
hould be produced mainly offshore, while high-variation goods are best made
close to markets.