Is provisional stenting the effective option? The WIDEST study (Wiktor stent in de novo stenosis)

Citation
Ds. Fluck et al., Is provisional stenting the effective option? The WIDEST study (Wiktor stent in de novo stenosis), HEART, 84(5), 2000, pp. 522-528
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
HEART
ISSN journal
13556037 → ACNP
Volume
84
Issue
5
Year of publication
2000
Pages
522 - 528
Database
ISI
SICI code
1355-6037(200011)84:5<522:IPSTEO>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
Aim-To compare the immediate and late outcomes of patients treated by a pol icy of routine stent implantation with routine balloon angioplasty and the use of stents only when an ideal result has not been obtained. Methods-A nine centre, multinational, randomised study of 300 patients with coronary artery disease thought suitable for treatment of a single lesion by balloon angioplasty or stent implantation. Only new lesions in patients who had not undergone previous bypass surgery were included, and totally oc cluded vessels were excluded. Results-The initial procedure was considered successful in 96% of patients. There was more complete angiographic restoration of luminal diameter in pa tients treated by elective stent (minimum lumen diameter (MLD) 2.68 mm for stent v 2.27 mm for balloon; p < 0.007), but analysis of the subgroup of ba lloon angioplasty patients who crossed over to stenting showed that they ac hieved similar results to the elective stent group. Late luminal loss was g reater in stented patients than in those undergoing balloon angioplasty onl y, and by six months the angiographic benefit of stenting had disappeared ( MLD 1.90 mm for stent group v 2.00 mm for balloon angioplasty). Angiographi c and clinical results in the balloon angioplasty group were assisted by th e high crossover rate (30.1%). Both groups had similar symptom relief, with 58.9% of patients improving by two or more angina grades. The need for fur ther revascularisation was also similar in the two groups at one year (18.2 % in the stented group v 17.1% in the balloon angioplasty group). Haemorrha gic complications at the local arterial entry site were more common than ex pected and were distributed equally between the patients receiving full ant icoagulation and those receiving antiplatelet treatment only. The results o f both Wiktor stent placement and balloon angioplasty were similar to the f indings in the stent group in previous randomised studies (Benestent II, ST RESS). Conclusions-Provisional stenting appears to offer the same longer term outc ome as elective stenting in this selected group of patients. Improvement in the results of conventional balloon angioplasty in the past 10 years means that a policy of obtaining an ideal result without the use of stents appea rs to be practicable in many of these patients, with consequent cost saving s.