Fundamental electrophysiological differences between low-dose intracoronary endothelin-1 infusion and myocardial ischemia revealed by multiple monophasic action potential recording
L. Geller et al., Fundamental electrophysiological differences between low-dose intracoronary endothelin-1 infusion and myocardial ischemia revealed by multiple monophasic action potential recording, J CARDIO PH, 36, 2000, pp. S167-S171
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
The supposed direct arrhythmogenic property of endothelin-1 (ET-1) has not
yet been clearly proven. Our study aimed to characterize the electrophysiol
ogical changes during left anterior descending artery (LAD) occlusion and i
ntracoronary (i.c.) ET-1 infusion, and to differentiate between the suppose
d direct and ischemic arrhythmogenic actions of ET-1 in a canine model. Cha
nges of monophasic action potential duration (MAPD9D) and upstroke velocity
(UV) are capable of detecting local ischemic changes. Left and right ventr
icular endo- (LVEND, RVEND) and epicardial (LVEF, RVEP) monophasic action p
otentials were recorded. MAPD90, monophasic action potential dispersion (MA
PDISP) and UV were determined. In group A (n = 8) 30 min LAD occlusion was
followed by a 60 min reperfusion period. In groups B and C ET-1 was adminis
tered into the LAD at rates of 30 (n = 8) and 60 pmol/min (n = 10), respect
ively. In group A after the LAD occlusion both MAPD90 and UV decreased sign
ificantly in the LAD region (LVEP and LVEND 18 +/- 3% and 10 +/- 1%, p < 0.
05, and 65 +/- 4% and 52 +/- 8%, respectively, p < 0.05: control and 30 min
values in all groups), whereas the increase in MAPDISP remained unchanged.
No severe arrhythmias were noticed in this group. In group B, both MAPD90
and MAPDISP increased significantly (LVEP and LVEND 11 +/- 48 and 18 +/- 3%
, p < 0.05; MAPDISP 200 +/- 408, p < 0.05), whereas UV remained unchanged a
t the end of the infusion. Early afterdepolarizations (EADs) were present i
n three instances. In group C both MAPD90 and MAPDISP increased significant
ly (LVEP and LVEND 12 +/- 58 and 25 +/- 8%, respectively, p < 0.05; MAPDISP
215 +/- 30% p < 0.05) and UV decreased slightly in the LAD region. EADs we
re observed in five instances. Severe arrhythmias were observed in both gro
ups B and C. We concluded that MAP prolongation, increased MAP dispersion a
nd development of EADs all contribute to the arrhythmogenic action of ET-1.
The lack of the almost prompt decrease of UV and MAPD90 which was observed
in group A in groups B and C strongly supports the probability of a direct
arrhythmogenic effect of ET-1.