Fundamental electrophysiological differences between low-dose intracoronary endothelin-1 infusion and myocardial ischemia revealed by multiple monophasic action potential recording

Citation
L. Geller et al., Fundamental electrophysiological differences between low-dose intracoronary endothelin-1 infusion and myocardial ischemia revealed by multiple monophasic action potential recording, J CARDIO PH, 36, 2000, pp. S167-S171
Citations number
8
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY
ISSN journal
01602446 → ACNP
Volume
36
Year of publication
2000
Supplement
1
Pages
S167 - S171
Database
ISI
SICI code
0160-2446(2000)36:<S167:FEDBLI>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
The supposed direct arrhythmogenic property of endothelin-1 (ET-1) has not yet been clearly proven. Our study aimed to characterize the electrophysiol ogical changes during left anterior descending artery (LAD) occlusion and i ntracoronary (i.c.) ET-1 infusion, and to differentiate between the suppose d direct and ischemic arrhythmogenic actions of ET-1 in a canine model. Cha nges of monophasic action potential duration (MAPD9D) and upstroke velocity (UV) are capable of detecting local ischemic changes. Left and right ventr icular endo- (LVEND, RVEND) and epicardial (LVEF, RVEP) monophasic action p otentials were recorded. MAPD90, monophasic action potential dispersion (MA PDISP) and UV were determined. In group A (n = 8) 30 min LAD occlusion was followed by a 60 min reperfusion period. In groups B and C ET-1 was adminis tered into the LAD at rates of 30 (n = 8) and 60 pmol/min (n = 10), respect ively. In group A after the LAD occlusion both MAPD90 and UV decreased sign ificantly in the LAD region (LVEP and LVEND 18 +/- 3% and 10 +/- 1%, p < 0. 05, and 65 +/- 4% and 52 +/- 8%, respectively, p < 0.05: control and 30 min values in all groups), whereas the increase in MAPDISP remained unchanged. No severe arrhythmias were noticed in this group. In group B, both MAPD90 and MAPDISP increased significantly (LVEP and LVEND 11 +/- 48 and 18 +/- 3% , p < 0.05; MAPDISP 200 +/- 408, p < 0.05), whereas UV remained unchanged a t the end of the infusion. Early afterdepolarizations (EADs) were present i n three instances. In group C both MAPD90 and MAPDISP increased significant ly (LVEP and LVEND 12 +/- 58 and 25 +/- 8%, respectively, p < 0.05; MAPDISP 215 +/- 30% p < 0.05) and UV decreased slightly in the LAD region. EADs we re observed in five instances. Severe arrhythmias were observed in both gro ups B and C. We concluded that MAP prolongation, increased MAP dispersion a nd development of EADs all contribute to the arrhythmogenic action of ET-1. The lack of the almost prompt decrease of UV and MAPD90 which was observed in group A in groups B and C strongly supports the probability of a direct arrhythmogenic effect of ET-1.