Thermodynamic and radiative impact of the correction of sounding humidity bias in the tropics

Citation
F. Guichard et al., Thermodynamic and radiative impact of the correction of sounding humidity bias in the tropics, J CLIMATE, 13(20), 2000, pp. 3611-3624
Citations number
44
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
ISSN journal
08948755 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
20
Year of publication
2000
Pages
3611 - 3624
Database
ISI
SICI code
0894-8755(20001015)13:20<3611:TARIOT>2.0.ZU;2-3
Abstract
Accurate measurements of atmospheric water vapor are crucial to many aspect s of climate research and atmospheric science. This paper discusses some of the meteorological implications of a bias discovered in the measurement of water vapor in widely deployed radiosonde systems. This problem apparently arose in the early 1990s, and a correction scheme has been recently develo ped that intends to remove the bias. The correction scheme also includes im provements in the humidity measurements in the upper troposphere and near t he surface. It has been applied to data taken during the Tropical Ocean and Global Atmosphere Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Response Experiment (TOGA COARE ). The impact of the bias on the general stability of the tropical atmosphere to deep convection, as measured by the convective available potential energ y (CAPE) and the convective inhibition (CW), is quite large. On the basis o f the uncorrected dataset, one might erroneously conclude that it is diffic ult to trigger deep convection over the region. When the correction is take n into account, the atmosphere over the tropical western Pacific becomes ty pically unstable to deep convection, with convective instability similar to that measured from aircraft in the vicinity of active convective systems. Radiative fluxes are also significantly modified. For clear sky conditions, it is found that on average, the net surface radiative flux increases by 4 W m(-2), and the outgoing longwave flux decreases by more than 2 W m(-2) d ue to the humidity correction. Under more realistic cloudy conditions, the differences are weaker but still significant. Changes in radiative fluxes a re explained at first order by the precipitable water increase. It is likely that such a dry bias would hide any modifications of the atmos pheric water vapor associated with the increase of greenhouse gases.