The authors investigated how far above a poor reader's instructional level
dyad reading should be used to promote the greatest growth in reading level
, word recognition, comprehension, and rate. Fifty-one poor readers were id
entified and randomly assigned to 1 of 3 experimental groups: (a) dyad read
ing at their instructional reading level, (b) dyad reading 2 grades above t
heir instructional reading level; and (c) dyad reading 4 grades above their
instructional reading level. For 95 days/sessions, all groups read 15 min
daily during their classroom recreational reading time. They all improved w
ith dyad reading regardless of the difficulty levels of materials. Results
suggest that the difficulty level of materials used for dyad reading may ma
ke a difference in student progress.