A. Gangjee et al., Design, synthesis, and X-ray crystal structure of a potent dual inhibitor of thymidylate synthase and dihydrofolate reductase as an antitumor agent, J MED CHEM, 43(21), 2000, pp. 3837-3851
A novel N-{2-amino-4-methyl[(pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidin-5-yl)ethyl]benzoyl}-L-
glutamic acid (3a) was designed and synthesized as a potent dual inhibitor
of thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) and as an a
ntitumor agent. Compound 3b, the N7-benzylated analogue of 3a, was also syn
thesized as an antitumor agent. The synthesis of 3a was accomplished via a
12-step sequence which involved the synthesis of 2-amino-4-methylpyrrolo-[2
,3-d]pyrimidine (10) in 5 steps from 2-acetylbutyrolactone. Protection of t
he 2-amino group of 10 and regioselective iodination at the 5-position foll
owed by palladium-catalyzed coupling afforded intermediate 14 which was con
verted to 3a by reduction and saponification. Similar synthetic methodology
was used for 3b. X-ray crystal structure of the ternary complex of 3a, DHF
R, and NADPH showed that the pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine ring binds in a "2,4-
diamino mode" in which the pyrrole nitrogen mimics the 4-amino moiety of 2,
4-diaminopyrimidines. This is the first example of a classical pyrrolo[2,3-
d]pyrimidine antifolate shown to have this alternate mode of binding to DHF
R. Compounds 3a and 3b were more inhibitory than LY231514 against TS from L
actobacillus casei and Escherichia coli. Analogue 3a was also more inhibito
ry against DHFR from human, Toxoplasma gondii, and Pneumocystis carinii. Ev
aluation of 3a against methotrexate (MTX)-resistant cell lines with defined
mechanisms indicated that cross-resistance of 3a was much lower than that
of MTX. Metabolite protection studies and folylpoly-gamma -glutamate synthe
tase studies suggest that the antitumor activity of 3a against the growth o
f tumor cells in culture is a result of dual inhibition of TS and DHFR. Com
pound 3a inhibited the growth of CCRF-CEM and FaDu cells in culture at ED50
values of 12.5 and 7.0 nM, respectively, and was more active against FaDu
cells than MTX. In contrast, compound 3b was inactive against both cell lin
es. Compound 3a was evaluated in the National Cancer Institute in vitro pre
clinical antitumor screening program and afforded IG(50) values in the nano
molar range against a number of tumor cell lines.