The paper reviews the literature on maintenance management, integrates key
dimensions of maintenance within a taxonomy of maintenance configurations,
and explores the impact of differing configurations on contextual factors a
nd operational performance. "Prevention", "hard maintenance integration" an
d "soft maintenance integration" were identified as key maintenance variabl
es. Data were collected from 253 Swedish manufacturing companies, and three
distinct clusters were identified. "Proactive Maintainers" emphasized prev
entive maintenance policies. "IT Maintainers" relied on computerized and co
mpany-wide integrated information systems for maintenance. "Maintenance Lag
gers" emphasized all maintenance dimensions to lesser extent than the other
s. The importance of maintenance prevention and integration differ between
contexts. There were subtle performance differences across identified confi
gurations, but preventive and integrated maintenance were more important fo
r companies seeking competitive process control and flexibility. There exis
ted no group with any great emphasis on all three maintenance dimensions, b
ut attaining truly high performance may require a rare mix of the three dim
ensions. This mix of variables could constitute a hypothesized "World Class
Maintenance" group. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.