Pathomorphologic characteristics of posttraumatic acetabular dysplasia

Citation
C. Dora et al., Pathomorphologic characteristics of posttraumatic acetabular dysplasia, J ORTHOP TR, 14(7), 2000, pp. 483-489
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
ISSN journal
08905339 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
7
Year of publication
2000
Pages
483 - 489
Database
ISI
SICI code
0890-5339(200009/10)14:7<483:PCOPAD>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Objectives: The pathomorphology of posttraumatic acetabular dysplasia diffe rs fundamentally from the classic developmental dysplasia of the adolescent . The aim of this report is to qualify and quantify the pathomorphologic ch aracteristics of the posttraumatic acetabular dysplasia and to define the r equirements for adequate corrective surgery in this type of dysplasia. Design and Material: Retrospective review of the anteroposterior (AP) radio graphs of ten patients with symptomatic posttraumatic acetabular dysplasia. In five cases, false profile views and in five cases computed tomography ( CT) scans were also available for investigation. Measurements of distances and angles on radiographs and CT scans were made by pencil and goniometer. Results: On the AP radiographs, posttraumatic acetabular dysplasia shows un iformly deformed true pelvis with an angular deformation of the innominate bone averaging 20 degrees in the region of the acetabular fossa that causes the concavity of the pelvic brim to increase in direction of the involved acetabulum and creates both a lateral and a caudal displacement of the acet abulum, averaging twenty-three millimeters and nine millimeters, respective ly. The increased width of the inner wall the acetabulum, measuring an aver age of eleven millimeters, makes lateralization of the center of the femora l head reach a mean of forty-three millimeters. The acetabular deformity in all cases shows a pronounced lateral deficiency. Ventral deficiency is mod erate. All ten posttraumatic dysplastic acetabuli show marked retroversion averaging 27 degrees. In contrast, the contralateral acetabuli shows a mean anteversion of 23 degrees. Conclusions: The morphology of this kind of acetabular dysplasia is uniform and differs significantly from that seen in classic developmental dysplasi a of the hip. For reconstructive surgery of such a hip, the challenge to ab olish the lateralization of the hip joint to restore normal body weight lev er arm is imperative. Because acetabular retroversion is a reproductive fea ture of posttraumatic dysplasia, it is important to avoid further reduction of the posterolateral containment of the femoral head and augmentation of the anterior acetabular wall, increasing the risk of anterior impingement.