Jp. Lavin et al., Teaching vaginal breech delivery and external cephalic version - A survey of faculty attitudes, J REPRO MED, 45(10), 2000, pp. 808-812
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain current faculty attitudes regarding teaching of vag
inal breech delivery (VBD) and external cephalic version (ECV).
STUDY DESIGN: A questionnaire was sent to obstetrics ann gynecology residen
cy programs. Respondents were queried regarding demographic parameters, res
ident and practice experience, and attitudes toward teaching these procedur
es.
RESULTS: Fifty-four (96%:) surveys were returned. Sixteen (30%) respondents
were female and 38 (70%) male. Sixteen (30%) completed residency prior to
1980, 17 (32%) during the 1980s and 21 (48%) during the 1990s. Nineteen (35
%) trained locally. Forty-seven (87%) recieved training in ECV. Thirty-two
rcsirlency. Thirty-five (65%) recieved training in ECV. Thirty-two (60%) ha
d performed VBDs in practice. However, only 18 (33%) continued to perform t
his procedure. During the proceeding three years, they reported performing
an average average of five VBDs per chief resident per year. Thirty-seven (
69%) performed ECV ill clinical practice. The 17 who did not indicated that
they refered to others. They reported performing an average of 15 ECVs per
chief resident per year. Fifty-two (96%) thought residents should still be
taught VBD. All faculty throught that residents should be taught ECV. None
of the above parameters exerted a statistically significant effect on thes
e opinions.
CONCLUSION: There tons nearly universal faculty support for continuing to t
each VBD to residents. However, only one-third of faculty members currently
perform this procedure. There do not appear to be sufficient numbers of VB
Ds to teach this procedure utilizing a "hands on" approach. There is univer
sal support for teaching ECV. There appear to be both enough individuals wi
th experience and enough procedures to accomplish this education.