Exercise-induced changes in the electrocardiogram have been used to identif
y coronary artery disease for almost a century. Over the past decade, howev
er, clinicians have increasingly focused on more expensive diagnostic tools
believing them to offer improved diagnostic accuracy. In fact, by incorpor
ating historical data, the simple exercise test can in most cases outperfor
m the newer tests, The use of prediction equations and non-staged exercise
protocols can improve the test still further, while advances In the use of
the test for prognosis, with the discovery of novel risk factors and the ad
dition of gas analysis, may in the future shift the primary emphasis away f
rom diagnosis. Brief, inexpensive, and done in most cases without the prese
nce of a cardiologist, the exercise test offers the highest value for predi
ctive accuracy of any of the non-invasive tests for coronary artery disease
.