Ohio like several other states in the US is mandated by law to optimally fl
uoridate all public water systems serving over 5000 people, The purpose of
this study was three-fold: 1) to determine if Ohioans on public water suppl
ies are receiving optimally fluoridated water, 2) to determine the knowledg
e level of water treatment plant operators who fluoridate drinking water, a
nd 3) to compare small and large water treatment plants, A pre-tested surve
y was sent to all 224 water treatment plants that adjust the fluoride conce
ntration of drinking water in Ohio. A 100% response rate was accomplished,
with 93 small and 131 large water treatment plants responding. A z-test was
computed to compare proportions between small and large water treatment pl
ants, Significance was assessed at p < 0,05, Nearly 90% of water treatment
plant operators correctly identified the optimal fluoride level, however al
most 30% used incorrect means of determining the optimal level. Approximate
ly three-quarters of the water treatment plant operators were able to maint
ain the fluoride concentration to within 0.1 mg F/L of their optimal level.
A significantly greater proportion of large water treatment plant operator
s were able to maintain a fluoride concentration to within 0.1 mg F/L of th
eir optimum level when compared to small water, treatment plant operators (
83.2% vs 60,2%, z = 3,60, p < 0.05) Most water treatment plant operators ar
e knowledgeable concerning fluoride levels, however small water treatment p
lant operators may need additional technical assistance to reach the level
attained by large plants.