Current techniques for permanent prostate brachytherapy are associated with
excellent biochemical control in patients with localized prostate cancer.
Data now available confirm 5- to 10-year results with this treatment modali
ty that are comparable to those with external-beam irradiation or radical p
rostatectomy. Nonetheless, treatment protocols and techniques for prostate
brachytherapy vary from center to center. Controversy exists regarding the
selection of patients for brachytherapy alone or in combination with extern
al-beam irradiation, The role of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation also rema
ins undefined in patients with localized prostate cancer. Matched-pair anal
ysis studies performed at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center have exami
ned the role of isotope selection, the addition of external-beam irradiatio
n, and the use of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation. These studies provide i
nsights into the use of permanent brachytherapy in patients with localized
prostate cancer. In addition, postimplant dosimetry needs to be a requireme
nt for centers performing seed implants. Data now appear to support specifi
c computed tomography-based criteria to evaluate implant quality and delive
red dose to the prostate, Unfortunately, prostate edema and poor imaging te
chniques limit the evaluation of implant dosimetry, Treatment planning tech
niques that utilize new imaging modalities, coupled with computerized treat
ment planning, may help improve the implant procedure and dosimetry.